Comments on: Issue #66

By: Wit

Wit — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:55:26 +0000

i haven’t read a publication regarding conglomo in a long while.
as one of the oldest members still in the alliance, i could say a lot here, but the main point is that people are leaving because they don’t like the way the alliance is heading. or headed.

all that matters to me is that i don’t have to worry about being ambushed in Keldon space doing my F/W/E runs.

By: davros

davros — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:12:30 +0000

i enjoyed the article about conglomo but would like to correct a few mistakes.

one > I haven;t just left conglomo and created a merc copy. I left conglomo many many months ago and have created an alliance of friends who haven’t quite joined yet ;)

two > As soon as we start taking contracts then we can be considered a merc clone ;) I defo copied the alliance page thing though (thats because it’s cool and funny and a wicked idea).

Since we don;t really intend to be hiring ourselves out I think it would be a mistake to say we are mercenaries.

I don’t require a a retraction but a little more research would be nice. I would have been quite happy to talk to your reporter about any questions he had about whats going on.

Cheers,

Love the new issue all, glad you’re back.

By: Daishine

Daishine — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:24:43 +0000

I would like to comment on the Conglomo article with regard to their security concerns in Union space. There was initially a lockdown with no access to anyone but this is being re-opened. In times of transition it is understandable that there will be disruption and I welcome a return to normality.

ps. nice to have you back Tribune :)